|
Round Tower Street
William Dodd in 1823 but it closed for periods in 1842 and 1851 and was
last seen in 1859. Licensee John Connor was moved here after the London,
Chatham, and Dover Railway required him to frequent his previous public
house, the "Phoenix," in 1959 for demolition,
perhaps he took the name with him, as I do have a licensee list for the "Phoenix"
after this date.
An "Exchange" at Charlton was reported in 1840
and 1851 but the
renewal was refused that year. Another with the sign was said to be kept by
Robert Birch in Beach Street in 1826.
|
From the Dover Telegraph and Cinque Ports General
Advertiser, Saturday 30 May, 1840.
DOVER POLICE REPORT
MONDAY - Richard Dixon, labourer, charged by police constable Lewis,
with an assault. Complainant stated as follows: On Friday morning about
2 o'clock I was called by Mr. Barnes, landlord of the "Royal Exchange,"
to take the prisoner into custody, he having been making a disturbance,
and endeavouring to gain admission to the house. I then took him in
charge, and was in the act of conducting him to the station-house, when
he ran away, and I did not overtake him till he reached the top of the
Commercial-quay. I then caught hold of him, and he pushed me over the
pent, where there was about ten feet of water. He then ran away and left
me, and it was with great difficulty I got out of the water. Dixon, in
his defence, said that he did not mean to push Lewis over - he only
tried to get away.
Fined 40s.; and in default, committed to prison for 14 days.
|
|
From the Dover Telegraph,30 May 1840.
POLICE COURT.
On Saturday last Richard Dixon, of the parish of Charlton, labourer,
was fined 40s, including costs, for resisting William Lewis, policeman,
in the execution of his duty; and in default of payment committed for
fourteen days. It appeared that between one and two o'clock in the
morning the landlord of the "Royal Exchange" requested Lewis to take Dixon
into custody, as he had previously been endeavouring to get into the
house against his (the landlord's) wish, having taken a shutter down for
the purpose. Lewis apprehended Dixon and was in the act of conducting
him to the Station-house, when he (Dixon) ran away. Lewis followed him
and caught him at the posts and chains on Commercial Quay, against which
Dixon ran, and was thereby stopped. Lewes then endeavoured to lay hold
of him, when he (Dixon) put out his hand and pushed him into the Pent.
Lewis could not say whether Dixon intended to push him into the Pent: he
might only intended to get from him.
|
|
From the Dover Telegraph and Cinque Ports Advertiser,
2 June, 1849.
Andrew Barnes, mariner, brought up on suspicion of felony.
Superintendent Laker stated that on Sunday morning a person named
Walker slept at the "Royal Exchange," kept by the friends of Barnes. On
retiring to bed Walter had a considerable sum of money about him, in the
morning he discovered a loss of £2 10s. His bed companion was searched,
but nothing found; and as the prisoner was reported to have gone into
Walker's bed-room at an early hour in the morning, suspicion was
attached to him as the perpetrator of the theft, and instructions were
issued for his apprehension, but he was found to have taken a hasty
departure to Canterbury, whither the Superintendent instructed a
constable to follow in pursuit, but without success. - No direct
evidence of the theft being, however, obtained. Barnes was released from
custard, with an intimation from the Bench that, in case of additional
evidence being procured by the police, he would be again brought up.
|
LICENSEE LIST
FREEMAN William Dodd 1823

BARNES John 1826-28+

FREEMAN John 1832-39+
 
BARNES Elias 1840-47 end
JOHNSON George Sept/1846-47
 
FREEMAN 1851
CONNOR John 1859
I know that 1959 was the last year the "Royal Exchange" was found, and I
know that John Connor was forced to move from the "Phoenix"
to here, but as I also have a list of licensees, including the Connor's
after that date at a pub called the "Phoenix" I
am inclined to think the "Royal Exchange" changed name to the "Phoenix"
again. I am hoping to find further evidence to substantiate this statement,
but it's the only thing that makes sense to me so far.
I have also found reference to another "Royal
Exchange" found in Beach Street, 1826. Unless they are one and the same.
From the Pigot's Directory 1823
From the Pigot's Directory 1828-9
From the Pigot's Directory 1832-33-34
From the Pigot's Directory 1839
From the Pigot's Directory 1840
From Bagshaw Directory 1847
|