DOVER KENT ARCHIVES
PUB LIST   PUBLIC HOUSES Paul Skelton and Jan Pedersen

Earliest 1853

Paris Hotel

Latest 1886

26 Harbour Street

Folkestone

 

Open in 1853 and built on the site of a blacksmith's shop owned by a Thomas Maxted. The name changed in 1886 to the "American and Paris" obviously to try to attract the Americans as well as the French.

 

From the Folkestone Chronicle 27 October 1855. Transcribed by Jan Pedersen.

Wednesday October 24th :- Present S. Mackie Esq., Mayor, W. Major Esq., G. Kennicott Esq., and W. Bateman Esq.

John Gibson appeared to answer a summons for an assault on George Fields in the bar of the "Paris Hotel," on Sunday evening last. The case was dismissed, the parties paying the costs, 9s 6d between them.

 

From the Folkestone Chronicle 3 September 1859. Transcribed by Jan Pedersen.

COUNTY COURT Thomas Griffin v Felix Denibas

Wednesday August 31st:- Before Charles Harwood esq., Judge.

Mr. Biron appeared for the defendant. The plaintiff was represented by. Mr. John Minter, who, in opening the case, said the plaintiff was Mr. Thomas Griffin, was a farmer, residing in this locality, and the defendant was Mr. Denibas, proprietor of the "Paris Hotel," and also a dealer in potatoes.

Some time in May last plaintiff went to defendant, and asked him if he had any potatoes for sale, as from the disturbed state of the Continent there was a probability of the ports being closed, and plaintiff wished to speculate in that article; ultimately, as he would prove by evidence of plaintiff, a verbal contract was entered into between him and defendant for 15 tons of potatoes at £3 5s per ton, to be delivered in a fortnight. When the negotiation was going on, plaintiff wished to reduce the contract into writing, but defendant would not consent to this; that of course would nullify the verbal contract; but he would be enabled to lay before the court, letters that had passed between the parties which would make it a contract binding in law. Plaintiff had received from defendant sixty sacks of potatoes, but after the delivery of them, defendant refused to supply him, except at an increase of 6d. per sack, which plaintiff refused to agree to. This action was therefore brought to recover the sum £15 as damages sustained by plaintiff for the breach of contract. The damage was estimated at 2s. 6.d per sack on 120 sacks – the number required to make up 15 tons. The letters referred to were then put in and read.

Mr. Griffin was then called, and being examined by Mr. Minter, proved the facts as stated by Mr. Minter.

Mr. Biron cross-examined plaintiff, but did not succeed in eliciting any new fact.

George Chaster, examined by Mr. Minter, proved taking a letter to defendant, from plaintiff, and bringing back a verbal answer, “that if the money was sent for the other potatoes delivered, plaintiff might have more”.

Thomas Dent, a waggoner to Mr. Griffin, proved taking a cheque for thirty sacks of potatoes, and the refusal of defendant to supply any more except at an increased price.

Mr. Minter said this completed the case.

Mr. Biron, in answer, said the only reply they had no contract between the parties, and that the defendant had not agreed to sell plaintiff 15 tons of potatoes. He argued that in all the conversations in the first instance, and in all the letters produced, 15 tons is only alluded to by Mr. Griffin, and it was an axiom in law, that two parties must agree to make a contract binding; but even if there was a contract it had been broken, for plaintiff said himself that the goods were to be paid for on delivery, and they had not been; this was a violation of the contract which he thought was fatal to the claim for damages; he would call Mr. Denibas, who would prove that there was no contract entered into at all; but that he was to supply Mr. Griffin at the regular market price in such quantities as he required, and that no contract for 15 tons, as alleged, had been entered into. Mr. Biron then called Mr. Denibas.

Before examining him however, His Honour (the Judge) asked Mr. Biron to look attentively at two letters put in, one from plaintiff, and a reply from defendant, clearly showing that a contract was made, and whether it would be advisable to swear the defendant after that.

Mr. Biron having consulted with the solicitor for the defence, and reading over the letters, intimated to His Honour that he should examine Mr. Denibas, who stated that plaintiff came to him on the evening of the day on which the foundation stone of the New Town Hall was laid, and asked him if he had any potatoes for sale, as his crops had failed and he wanted some very much. Defendant replied he had none on hand, but as soon as he had he should let him know. In the course of a day or two defendant had some from France, and immediately let plaintiff know he could have 60 sacks. Had never agreed to let Mr. Griffin have 5 tons, nor 15 tons either; only that when he had potatoes he would let him know.

Cross-examined by Mr. Minter, there was no price named for the potatoes when they first met. A person called Hart was there when the contract was made; was in the house before Mr. Griffin came in, and went out with him; could not recollect who else was there.

Jeffery Hart, examined by Mr. Biron, recollected Mr. Griffin asking Mr. Denibas if he had any potatoes for sale. Mr. Denibas said he had none, but would have some soon; could recollect nothing further.

Cross-examined by Mr. Minter – Was there about three quarters of an hour – came in about two minutes after Mr. Griffin, and remained after him. Heard nothing about the ports being closed – must have heard this conversation if it had taken place.

Mr. Minter shortly replied, and said the only point was the question of damages, as he thought he had proved his case by the evidence he had adduced.

His Honour said, no doubt a contract was made between the parties, and if plaintiff had agreed to the 6d. increase per sack the case would not have been heard at all, he should therefore award the sum of £6 10s. with costs.

 

From the Folkestone Chronicle 3 December 1859. Transcribed by Jan Pedersen.

COUNTY COURT George Beer v F. Denibas

Monday November 28th:- Before Charles Harwood esq., Judge

For £1 8s. for balance of account. Mr. Wightwick appeared for defendant, and put in a receipted bill for the amount claimed.

Verdict for defendant.

 

From the Folkestone Observer 26 March, 1864. Transcribed by Jan Pedersen.

A GENTLEMAN IN THE DALLANCE OF NYMPHS

Friday March 25th:- Before Captain Kennicott R.N. and James Tolputt, Esq.

Ann Mercer, who is not the handsomest of the frail sisterhood in Fancy Street, was charged with stealing various articles from the person of George William Freeth.

George William Freeth, at present staying at the "Pavilion Hotel," said that on Saturday night last, as I was walking in the street, he met the prisoner, Ann Mercer, and another girl. Prisoner, or her companion, asked me to treat them, and I did. We went into the "Paris Hotel," at the side door. We had some soda and brandy. I then had a necktie pin, and other articles. The other girl left us, and I went walking about with the prisoner. We then went to her rooms. I don't know where that was, but it was up some steps. I was not in my sober senses, but quite on the other side. I don't remember what took place after that, until I found myself in bed at the "Pavilion" next morning. I then missed a gold necktie pin, a little purse containing three Napoleons, a common pencil, a silver pencil case, walking stick, and a small pen-knife. I had all these things when I was in company with the prisoner, after the other girl went away. The walking stick produced by Superintendent Martin was the stick he had missed.

Prisoner: When we went up to my place we did not stay in my place two minutes. Had you all these things with you when you went into a shop and bought a veil for me? And then you wanted me to go into your apartments at the "Pavilion."

Prosecutor: When I first met her I had a dog with me, and I went home and took my dog home. I have no recollection of going in with her to buy a veil.

The Mayor: Did you ask her to go to your apartments at the "Pavilion?"

Prosecutor: I don't think I asked her to go to the "Pavilion" with me. I have no recollection of it.

Prisoner: He did. I left him outside the "Pavilion." I did not see him after that. As to that stick, it must have been left in the room when he went up. He did not stop there two minutes.

Superintendent Martin said that yesterday afternoon about three o'clock he received information about this robbery, and went to the "Pavilion" and saw the complainant. He described the property that had been stolen from him, including the stick produced, and described the prisoner. In consequence of that, witness went to the prisoner's house in Fancy Street. She was in bed. He said to her “You were in company with a gentleman last night”. She at first said “I have not been with a gentleman”. Afterwards she said she had been with a gentleman. Witness said “You have robbed him”. She denied it. Witness said “I want a stick that is here”. She said “I know nothing about a stick”. Witness said “He has lost his hat also”. She then said “I was drunk last night. I recollect now there is a stick in the room, and it is under the drawers. The gentleman left it here”. Witness looked under the drawers and found the stick produced, and then searched the room, but no more of the property was found. He then took her down to the "Pavilion," and Mr. Freeth identified her and gave her into custody. There was no hesitation in identifying her. He should be able to adduce other evidence if a remand to Wednesday were granted.

Prosecutor desired that the case might be immediately settled, as he wished to leave the town.

The Mayor, after consultation, said that for the ends of justice the case must stand over to Wednesday; but ultimately the prisoner was again placed in the dock and the evidence of Vincent Sinclair, 2, The Narrows, was given as follows:-

He saw Ann Mercer on Saturday night at The Narrows at about a quarter past ten. She was sober, and had the stick now produced in her hand. She told him he could have the stick now produced for sixpence. He took it in his hand and looked at it, and told her he did not want to buy it.

The magistrates now limited the case to the stick, and the prisoner giving consent to be tried by the magistrates, and pleading guilty, the bench committed her to prison with three months' hard labour.

Prosecutor was picked up, we understand, by a gentleman of the town, at the end of Fancy Street, in a state approaching insensibility, and was by him taken to the "Pavilion." The prisoner has been seventeen or eighteen time before the bench on charges of drunkenness, and once for robbery.

 

 

LICENSEE LIST

DENIBAS M 1858 Melville's 1858

DENIBAS Felix Oct/1857-62 Post Office Directory 1862Folkestone Chronicle

WEDDERBURN Christopher William 1874 Post Office Directory 1874

HILLS Alfred 1882 Post Office Directory 1882

 

Melville's 1858From Melville's Directory 1858

Post Office Directory 1862From the Post Office Directory 1862

Post Office Directory 1874From the Post Office Directory 1874

Post Office Directory 1882From the Post Office Directory 1882

Folkestone ChronicleFrom the Folkestone Chronicle

 

If anyone should have any further information, or indeed any pictures or photographs of the above licensed premises, please email:-

TOP Valid CSS Valid XTHML