|
26 Harbour Street
Folkestone
Open in 1853 and built on the site of a blacksmith's shop owned by a
Thomas Maxted. The name changed in 1886 to the "American and Paris"
obviously to try to attract the Americans as well as the French.
|
From the Folkestone Chronicle 27 October 1855. Transcribed by Jan Pedersen.
Wednesday October 24th :- Present S. Mackie Esq., Mayor, W. Major Esq.,
G. Kennicott Esq., and W. Bateman Esq. John Gibson appeared to answer a summons for an assault on George Fields
in the bar of the "Paris Hotel," on Sunday evening last. The case was
dismissed, the parties paying the costs, 9s 6d between them. |
|
From the Folkestone Chronicle 3
September 1859. Transcribed by Jan Pedersen.
COUNTY COURT Thomas Griffin v Felix Denibas
Wednesday August 31st:- Before Charles Harwood esq., Judge.
Mr. Biron appeared for the defendant. The plaintiff was represented
by. Mr. John Minter, who, in opening the case, said the plaintiff was
Mr. Thomas Griffin, was a farmer, residing in this locality, and the
defendant was Mr. Denibas, proprietor of the "Paris Hotel," and also a
dealer in potatoes.
Some time in May last plaintiff went to defendant, and asked him if
he had any potatoes for sale, as from the disturbed state of the
Continent there was a probability of the ports being closed, and
plaintiff wished to speculate in that article; ultimately, as he would
prove by evidence of plaintiff, a verbal contract was entered into
between him and defendant for 15 tons of potatoes at £3 5s per ton, to
be delivered in a fortnight. When the negotiation was going on,
plaintiff wished to reduce the contract into writing, but defendant
would not consent to this; that of course would nullify the verbal
contract; but he would be enabled to lay before the court, letters that
had passed between the parties which would make it a contract binding in
law. Plaintiff had received from defendant sixty sacks of potatoes, but
after the delivery of them, defendant refused to supply him, except at
an increase of 6d. per sack, which plaintiff refused to agree to. This
action was therefore brought to recover the sum £15 as damages sustained
by plaintiff for the breach of contract. The damage was estimated at 2s.
6.d per sack on 120 sacks – the number required to make up 15 tons. The
letters referred to were then put in and read.
Mr. Griffin was then called, and being examined by Mr. Minter, proved
the facts as stated by Mr. Minter.
Mr. Biron cross-examined plaintiff, but did not succeed in eliciting
any new fact.
George Chaster, examined by Mr. Minter, proved taking a letter to
defendant, from plaintiff, and bringing back a verbal answer, “that if
the money was sent for the other potatoes delivered, plaintiff might
have more”.
Thomas Dent, a waggoner to Mr. Griffin, proved taking a cheque for
thirty sacks of potatoes, and the refusal of defendant to supply any
more except at an increased price.
Mr. Minter said this completed the case.
Mr. Biron, in answer, said the only reply they had no contract
between the parties, and that the defendant had not agreed to sell
plaintiff 15 tons of potatoes. He argued that in all the conversations
in the first instance, and in all the letters produced, 15 tons is only
alluded to by Mr. Griffin, and it was an axiom in law, that two parties
must agree to make a contract binding; but even if there was a contract
it had been broken, for plaintiff said himself that the goods were to be
paid for on delivery, and they had not been; this was a violation of the
contract which he thought was fatal to the claim for damages; he would
call Mr. Denibas, who would prove that there was no contract entered
into at all; but that he was to supply Mr. Griffin at the regular market
price in such quantities as he required, and that no contract for 15
tons, as alleged, had been entered into. Mr. Biron then called Mr.
Denibas.
Before examining him however, His Honour (the Judge) asked Mr. Biron
to look attentively at two letters put in, one from plaintiff, and a
reply from defendant, clearly showing that a contract was made, and
whether it would be advisable to swear the defendant after that.
Mr. Biron having consulted with the solicitor for the defence, and
reading over the letters, intimated to His Honour that he should examine
Mr. Denibas, who stated that plaintiff came to him on the evening of the
day on which the foundation stone of the New Town Hall was laid, and
asked him if he had any potatoes for sale, as his crops had failed and
he wanted some very much. Defendant replied he had none on hand, but as
soon as he had he should let him know. In the course of a day or two
defendant had some from France, and immediately let plaintiff know he
could have 60 sacks. Had never agreed to let Mr. Griffin have 5 tons,
nor 15 tons either; only that when he had potatoes he would let him
know.
Cross-examined by Mr. Minter, there was no price named for the
potatoes when they first met. A person called Hart was there when the
contract was made; was in the house before Mr. Griffin came in, and went
out with him; could not recollect who else was there.
Jeffery Hart, examined by Mr. Biron, recollected Mr. Griffin asking
Mr. Denibas if he had any potatoes for sale. Mr. Denibas said he had
none, but would have some soon; could recollect nothing further.
Cross-examined by Mr. Minter – Was there about three quarters of an
hour – came in about two minutes after Mr. Griffin, and remained after
him. Heard nothing about the ports being closed – must have heard this
conversation if it had taken place.
Mr. Minter shortly replied, and said the only point was the question
of damages, as he thought he had proved his case by the evidence he had
adduced.
His Honour said, no doubt a contract was made between the parties,
and if plaintiff had agreed to the 6d. increase per sack the case would
not have been heard at all, he should therefore award the sum of £6 10s.
with costs.
|
|
From the Folkestone Chronicle 3 December 1859. Transcribed by Jan Pedersen.
COUNTY COURT George Beer v F. Denibas
Monday November 28th:- Before Charles Harwood esq., Judge
For £1 8s. for balance of account. Mr. Wightwick appeared for
defendant, and put in a receipted bill for the amount claimed.
Verdict for defendant.
|
|
From the Folkestone Observer 26
March, 1864. Transcribed by Jan Pedersen.
A GENTLEMAN IN THE DALLANCE OF NYMPHS
Friday March 25th:- Before Captain Kennicott R.N. and James Tolputt,
Esq.
Ann Mercer, who is not the handsomest of the frail sisterhood in
Fancy Street, was charged with stealing various articles from the person
of George William Freeth.
George William Freeth, at present staying at the "Pavilion
Hotel," said that on Saturday night last, as I was walking in the
street, he met the prisoner, Ann Mercer, and another girl. Prisoner, or
her companion, asked me to treat them, and I did. We went into the
"Paris Hotel," at the side door. We had some soda and brandy. I then had
a necktie pin, and other articles. The other girl left us, and I went
walking about with the prisoner. We then went to her rooms. I don't know
where that was, but it was up some steps. I was not in my sober senses,
but quite on the other side. I don't remember what took place after
that, until I found myself in bed at the "Pavilion" next morning. I then
missed a gold necktie pin, a little purse containing three Napoleons, a
common pencil, a silver pencil case, walking stick, and a small
pen-knife. I had all these things when I was in company with the
prisoner, after the other girl went away. The walking stick produced by
Superintendent Martin was the stick he had missed.
Prisoner: When we went up to my place we did not stay in my place two
minutes. Had you all these things with you when you went into a shop and
bought a veil for me? And then you wanted me to go into your apartments
at the "Pavilion."
Prosecutor: When I first met her I had a dog with me, and I went home
and took my dog home. I have no recollection of going in with her to buy
a veil.
The Mayor: Did you ask her to go to your apartments at the
"Pavilion?"
Prosecutor: I don't think I asked her to go to the "Pavilion" with
me. I have no recollection of it.
Prisoner: He did. I left him outside the "Pavilion." I did not see
him after that. As to that stick, it must have been left in the room
when he went up. He did not stop there two minutes.
Superintendent Martin said that yesterday afternoon about three
o'clock he received information about this robbery, and went to the
"Pavilion" and saw the complainant. He described the property that had
been stolen from him, including the stick produced, and described the
prisoner. In consequence of that, witness went to the prisoner's house
in Fancy Street. She was in bed. He said to her “You were in company
with a gentleman last night”. She at first said “I have not been with a
gentleman”. Afterwards she said she had been with a gentleman. Witness
said “You have robbed him”. She denied it. Witness said “I want a stick
that is here”. She said “I know nothing about a stick”. Witness said “He
has lost his hat also”. She then said “I was drunk last night. I
recollect now there is a stick in the room, and it is under the drawers.
The gentleman left it here”. Witness looked under the drawers and found
the stick produced, and then searched the room, but no more of the
property was found. He then took her down to the "Pavilion," and Mr.
Freeth identified her and gave her into custody. There was no hesitation
in identifying her. He should be able to adduce other evidence if a
remand to Wednesday were granted.
Prosecutor desired that the case might be immediately settled, as he
wished to leave the town.
The Mayor, after consultation, said that for the ends of justice the
case must stand over to Wednesday; but ultimately the prisoner was again
placed in the dock and the evidence of Vincent Sinclair, 2, The Narrows,
was given as follows:-
He saw Ann Mercer on Saturday night at The Narrows at about a quarter
past ten. She was sober, and had the stick now produced in her hand. She
told him he could have the stick now produced for sixpence. He took it
in his hand and looked at it, and told her he did not want to buy it.
The magistrates now limited the case to the stick, and the prisoner
giving consent to be tried by the magistrates, and pleading guilty, the
bench committed her to prison with three months' hard labour.
Prosecutor was picked up, we understand, by a gentleman of the town,
at the end of Fancy Street, in a state approaching insensibility, and
was by him taken to the "Pavilion." The prisoner has been seventeen or
eighteen time before the bench on charges of drunkenness, and once for
robbery.
|
LICENSEE LIST
DENIBAS M 1858

DENIBAS Felix Oct/1857-62
 
WEDDERBURN Christopher William 1874

HILLS Alfred 1882

From Melville's Directory 1858
From the Post Office Directory 1862
From the Post Office Directory 1874
From the Post Office Directory 1882
From the Folkestone Chronicle
|