From the Dover Mercury, 2 May, 2002.

THE Railway Bell on London Road, has returned to its original name after being known as Pickwicks since 1983.

Now boasting an all day food menu, the popular pub held its official re-launch last Tuesday when it staged an 80s night to raise money for the Temple Ewell Players.

For more information please call the Railway Bell on 01304 822016.

Landlady and landlord, Catherine Woodward and Francis Gorham are pictured with manageress Deborah Whitehouse.

From the Dover Express, 23 October 2003.

DAREDEVIL pub patrons have managed to raise over £2,000 for charity by bungee jumping in the dark. The brave jumpers, regulars of the Railway Bell pub in London Road, took the 200 foot plunge to raise money for the Kent Air Ambulance on October 10. The crane and launch basket were set up in the pub's car park, with participants falling towards tarmac at an alarming speed before being bounced back up by the bungee cord.

As well as the sponsored jumpers taking part, bungee enthusiasts from around the county were also attracted to the event, making the night a busy one for all involved. Pub manager Deborah Whitehouse (right, holding Tee-shirt) was thrilled with the event's success.

From the Dover Express and East Kent Intelligencer, 14 July, 1871. Price 1d.

ASSAULTING A CONSTABLE

John Cornish, 20 years of age, a soldier in the 2nd Battalion Rifle brigade, quartered at Dover, was charged by K.C.C. Edward King with being drunk and disorderly at the “Railway Bell,” River, and assaulting him while in the execution of his duty.

It appeared that the prisoner got in behind the bar of the public-house and becoming belligerent stripped himself to his skin, and declared himself ready to fight all corners. The police were called in, and in getting him out of the house King was assaulted.

The Magistrates sent him to prison for seven days, owing to the good character given him by the sergeant of the company.

From the Dover Express and East Kent News, Friday, 26 March, 1875.

SUICIDE AT EWELL

A coroner's inquest was held on Tuesday afternoon at the "Railway Bell Inn," Ewell, before T. Delasaux, Esq., Coroner for the County, on the body of Thomas Claringbould, carpenter, aged 47 years, who shot himself about five o'clock on the previous morning. Deceased formerly resided at Dover, where he was well known, but for several years past he has lived in one of the detached villa, residences at Ewell, occupied by Mr. Shuttle. The following were sworn on the jury:- Mr. R. Tritton, Mr. T. Shepherd, Mr. G. Down, Mr. W. Ayers, Mr. W. Wraight, Mr. G. Simpson, Mr. R. T. Forward, Mr. J. W. Bacon, Mr. E. Maxted, Mr. J. Pierce, Mr. G. Gammon, and Mr. C. Langley. The latter gentleman having been chosen foreman, the jury proceeded to view the body, which was lying, saturated with blood, on the floor beside the bed where the rash act was committed. From the position of the wound it is supposed the deceased must have leaned on the muzzle of the gun and fired it by means of a brace attached to the trigger. On the return of the jury room the following evidence was adduced:-

Louise Nye: I belong to River, and am in the service of Mr. Shuttle, who is a widow. The deceased lived at Mrs. Shuttle's, who has brought him up as a lad. I have lived with Mrs. Shuttle twelve months. Deceased has lived in the house all the time I have been in Mrs. Shuttle's service. Yesterday morning about five o'clock I heard the report of a gun, apparently from the bedroom of the deceased. I immediately went there and saw the deceased lying on the floor quite dead. During the whole time I have been with Mrs. Shuttle deceased has appeared low and melancholy, but from what cause I do not know. I last saw him alive at ten o'clock on Sunday night, just before I went to bed.

By a Juror: There appeared no difference in him on Sunday night than on any other night.

Thomas Newman: I live at Kearsney, and am agent to Mr. Churchward. Yesterday morning at a quarter past five, I heard a loud knocking at my front door. I ran down directly and there saw the last witness, Louisa Wye. In consequence of what she said I directly went to the house of Mr. Shuttle, and on going up the stairs to the bedroom, there saw deceased lying on the floor in the same position as the jury have just viewed the body. He was quite dead. I saw the gun now produced on the floor about a yard from the body, and it had been recently discharged. I have known deceased for upwards of twenty years. During the last week he has appeared strange in his conduct, but from what cause I do not know. I am quite satisfied the gun was discharged by the act of the deceased.

Thomas Ray, K.C.C., stationed at Ewell: I was sent for yesterday morning to the house of Mrs. Shuttle, and there saw the body of the deceased. On searching his person I found the following articles; a purse containing 16s. 6d., four dog and gun licences, two knives, three gun caps, and several other articles.

Francis Ezekial Barton, of Dover, surgeon: I was sent for yesterday morning early to attend the deceased, whom I found on the floor, quite dead. I examined the body and found a gun shot wound on the front of his chest, at the right side of his heart, which, I believe, was caused by gunpowder and a discharge of leaded shot, which I should imagine produced instantaneous death. From the nature and position of the wound I have no hesitation in saying the same was caused by his own hand.

The Coroner very briefly summed up the evidence and the Jury returned a verdict that "Deceased shot himself when in a state of mental derangement."

From the Dover Express and East Kent News, Friday 6 May, 1881. 1d.

REFUSING TO LEAVE LICENSED PREMISES

George Bradford, a labourer looking man, was charged with being drunk and disorderly and refusing to leave the premises of the “Railway Bell” public-house, Ewell.

Mrs. Downs, wife of the landlord of the “Railway Bell,” Ewell, said: On Thursday week, the 21st of April, at ten minutes to four, the defendant came into my house drunk, and asked to be served with two of rum, which I refused to serve him, and he then called me bad names, and used very obscene language, so I ordered him out of the house, but he refused to go. I sent for my husband, and as soon as he came the prisoner ran out of the house.

Alfred Davis residing at Ewell, said: I was in the “Railway Bell” on Thursday week, and saw the prisoner there, drunk. He called for two of rum, but the landlady refused to serve him, and he then called for a bottle of ginger beer, which was supplied him, but not paying for it the landlady told him of it, and he said he would see her b____d first, and then would not pay for it. He used very bad language. When Mr. Downs came the prisoner left the house.

The prisoner said the row was about an allowance he had left for a man, and which had not been supplied.

The Bench fined him 10s. and 14s. 2d. costs, which was paid.

From the Dover Express and East Kent News, Friday 14 April, 1882. 1d.

BY WHAT AUTHORITY?

On behalf of the landlord of the “Railway Bell,” Kearsney, Mr. Carder, solicitor, applied for permission for the public-house to be open half an hour later every evening all the year round for the accommodation of the people who came to meet the late train that arrives at ten minutes past ten, which is ten minutes after the house is closed by law, enlarging on the inconvenience caused by the closing of the house at that hour, Mr. Carder put in a numerously signed memorial, playing for the half hour’s extension to be granted.

The Clerk asked Mr. Carder to point out the section under which the Magistrates had the power to grant this request.

Mr Carder said he realised on the general discretion which was vested in the Magistrates in the administration of the Act.

The Chairman asked Mr. Carden if he could quote any precedent at any other railway station.

Mr. Carden said he was not prepared with one.

Mr. Humphries said that if time were granted in this instance, it might be claimed by every public-house that was near a railway station.

The Chairman said they must, if they gave a decision, then give a refusal, but if Mr. Carder preferred it they would adjourn the matter for a month, that he might have time to search for some authority or a precedent.

The case was adjourned.

From the Dover Express and East Kent News, Friday 19 May, 1882. 1d.

AN APPLICATION

Mr. W. Mowll applied on behalf of the landlord of the “Railway Bell,” at Ewell, for an extension of half-an-hour at night, the house closing at present at ten o’clock. He stated that an application had been made by the landlord at the last Sessions, but the decision had been reserved till that day. The extension was required more especially for Saturday’s, when there is a down train which arrives at Ewell at 10.15, bringing persons of that village from Canterbury Market, and the landlord was unable to serve them with refreshments. He was also obliged to turn their horse and carts, which are left there, out into the front at ten o’clock to await the arrival of the owners by the train, and frequently they were left all that time in the rain. He had a memorial with about twenty signatures of persons living in that locality to support the application. If the Bench could not see their way clear to granting the application for each night he would be satisfied with Saturday alone.

After a short discussion the bench decided to refuse to grant the application.

Mr. Mowll said that there was another matter that had arisen out of this application at the last Court, it had come to the landlord’s knowledge that Captain Ruxton, of the County Police, had received a letter which was the grossest possible slander on this house, and in which it was stated that this house is the resort of women of immoral character, and was in fact a bad place, the landlord and landlady being accused of drunkenness, but on sending the letter to the captain he had refused to give the name of the information, as it had been the landlord’s intention to proceed against the person, as under the circumstances it was plainly proved to be untrue. Superintendent Maxted had visited all the houses in the district with reference to the matter, and had been told by all that such was not the case. He (Mr. Mowll) would ask the Bench for the information as it was a libel.

The Magistrates Clerk said he did not believe Captain Ruxton would take any notice of any order from the Bench, but he might if the application were granted at the Board of General Sessions, which was held every three weeks.

Mr. Mowll said that Superintendent Maxted, who had informed the landlord of the complaint, had made an exhaustive enquiry into the matter, but found that the charges were without foundation. This case arose out of a remark made by the Superintendent at the last application.

The Magistrate’s Clerk said that the Superintendent had merely said that he had received complaints to the house. He had since found out that they were not true.

The Bench said that they could do nothing in the matter except advise the applicant to go to the Board of General Sessions, but with regard to the application of extension of time, they had not been influenced by any such report of complaint as made, but they did not know of any statute by which they could grant the application.

From the Dover Express and East Kent Intelligencer, 3 November, 1882. Price 1d.

FOUND DROWNED AT RIVER

Mr. T. T. Delasaux, County Coroner, held an inquest at the “Railway Bell,” Kearsney, near Ewell, on Saturday morning last, respecting the death of a Dover tradesman named Pascall, whose body had been found in the Dour near Mr. Mannering’s mill at River. Edward Pascall, son of the deceased, identified the body, and said that his father was 50 years of age, and a cabinet maker, living in Dover. The deceased had left home on the Thursday morning, and had not returned. James Martin, a cowman in the employ of Mr. Jennings, at River, gave evidence with reference to finding the body. He stated that at about half-past seven o’clock on Friday morning he was near Mr. Mannering’s mill when he saw something in the river, which he took to be a coat, but on pulling it ashore found that it was the body of the deceased. With assistance he conveyed it to a shed near, belonging to Mr. F. Phipps.

It appeared that the deceased was missing on Thursday, and as it was known that he had gone to River, Instructing Constable Ross was directed to make enquiries, and he traced him from various public-houses, and one would be led to suppose that the deceased had fallen in while the worse for drink.

The Jury returned an open verdict of “Found Drowned.”

From the Dover Express and East Kent Intelligencer, 17 March, 1882. Price 1d.

APPLICATIONS

The landlord of the “Railway Bell,” Ewell, asked for permission to keep his house open till half-past ten o’clock at night, as the down train arrived at ten minutes past ten o’clock, and he was frequently asked for drink from travellers by the train.

The bench said they could not grant the application, but advised the applicant to attend the next Court, and in the meantime the Magistrates would talk the matter over.

From the Dover Express and East Kent News, Friday, 26 April, 1889. Price 1d.

GREAT ROW AT RIVER

There was a great disturbance at the “Railway Bell,” River, on Easter Monday, arising out of the refusal of the landlady to supply some persons who went out from Dover, with as much beer as they wanted. A Constable was called in to turn them out, and there was a free fight outside the house, which lasted about half an hour. The parties were brought before the Magistrates, Dr. Astley and Mr. G. E. Toomer, at Dover, on Tuesday, charged with the assault.

Frederick Stamp, a shoemaker, living at 36, Tower Hamlets Road, and Martha Stamp, his wife, Alfred Hatton, in the employ of the Dover Steam Laundry Company, and Sarah Hatton, his wife, were charged with being disorderly on licensed premises and refusing to quit, and assaulting Police-constable Crapps while in the execution of his duty.

Mr. Martyn Mowll appeared for the prisoner Hatton and his wife.

Jane Down said: I keep the “Railway bell,” River with my husband George Down. The prisoners came into my house all together last evening at a quarter to six o’clock. They called for drink, and they were served with some – four quarts they had altogether. They were all right and quiet when they came in. They began to make a noise after they had been in the house about half an hour, and I told them to go out. They did not go and prisoner Hatton came out of the tap room and wanted another quart. I refused him as they were making such a noise. The other man Stamp then came into the front of the bar from the tap room and asked for more beer. I refused him also, and they all came out fo the room and swore at me, and created a noise. My husband was in the garden and I sent for him. The two women used filthy language towards me. I told them again to leave the bar, and they would not go, so I sent for a Constable, and Police-constable Crapps came. They were in the bar when he came, and I asked them to leave in the Constable’s presence. The prisoner Hatton said he was not going out for any Policeman, and Stamp and he said he had been a Policeman and was not going. The Constable put Hatton out of the door. The others followed them out. Mrs. Hatton struck the Constable first, and they then all turned on him and struck him. They knocked him down. The two men were striking him and knocking him down. They were fighting outside for about half-an-hour, and the Constable’s face and clothes were covered with blood. He drew his staff and struck both of the men. A young man – a Marine, - who was passing, went and assisted the Constable. The Constable took all of them into custody with the exception of the man Hatton, who ran away.

By Mr. Mowll: Hatton came into my house with the others. They were in the house about an hour and a quarter before the Constable came. The prisoners were sober when they came in, as far as I could see, and they were not drunk when they left. No filthy language was used before I refused to serve them with more beer. I refused to serve them because they were making a noise. The prisoner Hatton and his wife were dancing and I asked them to stop, but they did not do so. When they got outside the fight commenced, and it was not until a quarter of an hour afterwards that the Constable drew his staff. My husband could not assist as he was suffering from rheumatism. The other people did not assist, but only looked on. The Constable struck both the men. When the Constable fell, the men also fall down. He was knocked down three times. The Policeman fell underneath the first time. He kept his staff. There were a number of ladies and gentlemen in the house.

By Stamp: I saw the Policeman knocked you down first, and when he knocked you down you were fighting with him.

William Walter Crapps, whose face appeared to be much bruised, said: I am a Police-constable, and was on duty last evening about seven o’clock. I was at home, and was sent for to go to the “Railway Bell.” When I got there I found all four prisoners in the house. The two women in particular were using filthy language to Mr. and Mrs. Down. They were all making a noise. Mrs. Down asked them to leave, and the two men said they should not go. I then asked them to leave and also the woman, but they refused. I asked Mrs. Down if they were to leave, and she said “Yes.” Stamp said he would not be put out by any man. At the same time Hatton struck me in the chest and face. I caught hold of him by the shoulders and ran him out of the door. When near the doorway Mrs. Hatton had got the other woman’s baby in her arms and struck me twice in the ear with her right hand. I swung my hand round to keep her off and she fell down with the baby. With that they all set upon me. Mrs. Hatton got, up left the baby on the ground, and came and struck me. They all kept striking me until the blood got into my eyes that I could scarcely see at times. In the struggle the two prisoners and myself went down three times. They struck me while I was on the ground. I then drew my staff in self-defence when I got up. I struck at Hatton, and believe I struck him on the head. Someone said, “Give it to the b______.” And Stamp was striking me. I struck him two or three times with my staff, and Hatton ran away. A soldier came to my assistance. I took all the prisoners into custody except Hatton. Hatton surrendered himself. My coat is covered with blood. They struck me with their fists.

By Mr. Mowll: The woman Hatton had struck me twice before I pushed her down. It might have been pushing the woman down that caused the disturbance.

In answer to Mrs. Stamp, witness said he did not drink any beer which she said she offered him.

Henry Harlow, belonging to Nonington, said: I am a Marine and stationed at the Chatham Division. I was out on leave, and was going past the “Railway Bell” last night about seven o’clock. I saw the Constable there – he was just going inside the door. I heard some high words, so I stood and watched. I saw the Constable push the prisoner Hatton out of the house. Hatton’s wife struck the Constable twice in the face, and the Constable pushed her away, she fell down with the baby in her arms. The men and women struck the Constable, and then Mrs. Hatton got up and also struck the Constable, whose face was covered with blood. The Constable fell with the men two or three times. I saw him draw his staff and strike the men. In my opinion it was necessary for him to draw his staff. There were nine or ten civilians near, but none went to his assistance. Seeing he was getting the worst of it, I went and asked him if he wanted any help. He said “Yes,” and I then assisted him in taking them to the Police station. The man Hatton ran away.

The Chairman commended the witness for assisting the Constable.

Mr. Edward Fry said he had known Hatton for about two years, and knew him to be an honest and sober man.

The Bench fined Hatton 14s 7½d., his wife 18s. 5½d; Stamp, 16s. 11½d., and his wife 18s. 5½d, including costs.

Fourteen days were allowed to Stamp and his wife for payment.

From the Dover Express and East Kent News, Friday, 7 February, 1890.

ENFORCING THE MUZZLING ORDER

On Saturday, before W. L. Lowndes and E. F. Astley, Esqrs., at Dover, Mr. Richard Harvey Hammond, of River, was summoned for having on the 27th January allowed his dog to be in the public highway at River unmuzzled, in contravention of the Muzzling Order.

The defendant admitted the fact.

Police-constable Crapps, stationed at River, said: On the 27th January, he saw the defendant’s dog in the road near the “Railway Bell Inn,” River, unmuzzled. He had also seen it several times before in the public road without a muzzle, and had called at the defendant’s house, and left word about the dog being unmuzzled.

Mr. Hammond said he had complied with the requirements of the order, and obtained a muzzle for the dog. He gave instructions to the lad always to muzzle the dog when it was let out. The dog however, on the day in question had run out without the muzzle.

The Bench imposed a fine of 1s. and 8s. costs.

The money was paid.

Henry Addaye, residing at Alkham, was summoned for a similar offence, on January 22nd.

Defendant pleaded not guilty.

Instructing-constable Ross, stationed at Alkham, proved the charge, and said he met the defendant on the 22nd January at South Alkham. Defendant had a terrier dog with him not muzzled, and witness told him that he had previously cautioned him he should report the case.

The Magistrates fined the defendant 10s. including costs; and the money was paid.

From the Dover Express and East Kent News, Friday, 26 January, 1900.

DEVELOPMENT OF KEARSNEY

KEARSNEY, Ewell, and River, three linked villages which are now almost joining hands with Dover, are becoming the fashionable suburb of this ancient Borough. As far back as 1821, Mr. J. M. Fector, a Dover banker, selected this locality as a residence, and built for himself the mansion known as Kearsney Abbey, which he occupied, and which has since been the residence successively of Mr. Churchward, the Marquis of Ely, and now of C. W. Curtis, Esq., J.P. At the time when the Abbey was built there were only two other mansions of any note in the locality, namely, Old Park, the new residence of Mr. J. Every, and Archer’s Court, the domain of Mr. G. Stringer. Since then there has been a wonderful development, mad both by extensions and new buildings. Along Crabble Hill villas and bungalows have sprung up, forming quite a suburb of itself. A little further away at the lower corner of Whitfield Hill, Woodlands, since it has become the residence of Sir William Crundall, has been greatly improved and surrounded by extensive grounds, in which thousands of trees have been planted. A little to the South-West on the other side of the main Canterbury Road Mr. Eugene Carder has built for himself a very fine country house. About Kearsney Station a considerable building estate has been opened, and several handsome villas have already appeared. In Ewell itself no great amount of modern buildings has been done, but the Church in recent years has been restored, and the schools built.

The greatest building movement at Kearsney is now about to commence, Mr. Alfred Leney having decided to erect on his newly acquired estate at Kearsney Nest a new residence, which for size and importance will put the Abbey in the shade. It will be built of Hastings stone and we hear that the contract price of the work is £10,000. Tenders for building were invited, the highest, we hear being £13,000, and the one accepted, Mr. Paramour’s, being the sum above mentioned. This house will necessarily occupy a considerable time in building, for before one stone can be laid on another several thousand tons of earth will have to be removed to prepare the foundations. The residence will have a most charming outlook on the sylvan scene, where the southern tributary of the Dour runs along its front from Bushy Ruff.

To add to this activity in this locality we hear that something like a thousand pounds is to be spent on improving the “Railway Bell Hotel” near Kearsney Station, which has recently changed hands. Passing into the lower part of the River the trail of the builder will be found there, and growing up close by is the new building estate within the Borough of Dover, which is being developed around the Athletic Ground. The next thing will be an extension of the tram line to accommodate this rising and fashionable suburb of Dover.

From the Dover Express and East Kent News, Friday, 16 February, 1900.

ANOTHER FIRST OFFENCE

John Cameron O’Hara was summoned by Inspector Hampshire, of the Royal Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals, for cruelly working a mare on January 13th at River, while it was in an unfit state, suffering from sores on the shoulders.

P.C. Mackie said that on January 30th he saw defendant driving a horse attached to a cart loaded with bricks at River near the “Railway Bell.” He saw the horse had something the matter with it, and he found two sores on the shoulder and one on the withers.

Prisoner said that the horse had been in the stable for four days, and that the sores had apparently healed, but the rough road from the Brickfield at St. Radigund’s to River had broken them.

George Lewis, jun., was summoned for causing the horse to be worked.

Defendant pleaded guilty.

The Inspector said that he saw Mr. Lewis the next day and he then said that the horse would not be sent out again. He had not had to speak to him before.

Mr. Lewis said the former carter in charge of the horse ill treated it, and he discharged him for this on January 26th, and from that time till January 31st it was kept in the stable. On the day in question he telephoned to the Brickfield to take some bricks to River and the horse was sent without his seeing it.

Inspector Hampshire: You said you saw the horse when it left.

Defendant said that he saw it when it came back.

He was continuing his statement when the Inspector interposed with the remark that he had pleaded guilty.

Mr. Bradley: Inspector Hampshire you must allow this man to make a statement as well as yourself!

The Bench eventually imposed a penalty of 10/6 on O’Hara, and 18/6 on Lewis, and gave the latter the information that he was responsible for his servants’ acts.

Mr. Lewis said every carter was supposed to look after his horse.

From the Dover Express and East Kent News, Friday, 18 May, 1900.

KEARSNEY RAILWAY BELL

Mr. Arthur Harby attended and submitted for formal approval plans of works being carried out by Messrs. A. Leney and Co. at the “Railway Bell,” Kearsney. It was a matter of courtesy that these plans should be submitted to the Magistrates, but by an inadvertency they had not been placed before the bench earlier. The works were now in progress, and they comprised the alterations to a country house to meet more modern requirements.

From the Dover Express and East Kent News, Friday, 30 November, 1900. Price 1d.

BURIED ALIVE AT RIVER

An inquest was held by Mr. R. M. Mercer, the east Kent Coroner, at the “Railway Hotel,” Kearsney, on Wednesday evening, on the body of Walter James Marley, a labourer, who was killed by a fall of earth, in a stone pit, which buried him. The Jury consisted of Messrs. B. Burbridge (foreman) , W. Clark, J. Robson, F. Peters, W. Smith, W. Lefevre, T. Hymers, W. Simpson, E. Dann, H. Hopper, S. Smith, H. Stanley, and F. Baynton.

Deceased’s father said deceased’s age was 22 years.

William Shapely said that he was at work on the afternoon of Tuesday with deceased in a stone hole, at Mr. Leney’s orchard. Witness had said the deceased that they would fill one more barrow that day, before knocking off to sift the stones. Deceased was in the hole, which was 14 or 15 feet deep, getting out flints, and witness went off with a barrow-load and shot it 40 yards away. As he returned he saw the earth from the top of the hole sliding down. Witness shouted to deceased who made a rush. But was caught by the earth and witness, unable to reach him, ran for a hand line. The earth came gradually at first, but then came down with a rush. When witness got back with the line deceased was covered completely. All the men then set-to and dug deceased out in a very short time. Witness thought the earth was safe. They had often tried to bar it down when it was like that, but found it very difficult to dislodge. They had not undermined the side which fell, that was dug as straight as the wall of a room. Witness was 24 years of age, and had worked for Mr. Clark, at Chilton, at similar work. They had worked at getting the top off nearly all day on Monday. Witness was paid piece-work, 1½d. per yard top soil, 1s. per yard stone, 9d. per yard breaking, and 1s. per yard gravel. Witness was quite sure they had not undermined the side which fell, they had, however, undermined 1¼ feet the other side.

William Lane, 9, River Street, River, said he worked at the same work in another hole, and helped to dig out deceased. He was found doubled up as though sitting, but with his head down. They were ten minutes digging him out, and the doctor came three or four minutes afterwards.

The Coroner asked a number of questions as to the method of payment.

Witness said if they worked all day moving top soil they would only earn about 1s. each, but it would give them two days work getting stones out at 1s. 9d. a yard. In a good week they could earn £2 5s. 5d. between them.

The Coroner: That is very fair.

Witness further said he was 19, and had never worked at this before.

Mr. A. Long said he was summoned at 2.20 and arrived at 2.30 at the scene of the accident. Deceased had been dug out but was dead. There were two severe injuries to his head, and from the appearance of one on the forehead that might have caused death, and if it did not do so at once deceased would have been rendered unconscious before being suffocated by the earth.

The Coroner, in summing up, said that had elicited from his questions as to the pay, that the men evidently regarded getting stones out as more profitable work than getting the top soil away, and had dug the hole one side perpendicular and the other side undermined. There seemed to be no negligence on the part of anyone, except the men in not removing sufficient top soil.

The Jury returned a verdict of accidental death.

From the Dover Express and East Kent News, Friday, 6 January, 1905. Price 1d.

SAD DEATH AT RIVER

On Saturday evening, an inquest was held at the “Railway Bell,” at Kearsney, by the Borough Coroner, Sydenham Payn, Esq., on the body of Mary Ann Harbour, who for many years has been a resident of the parish. On the previous day the neighbours noticed that no one was about at 2, Avenue Terrace, where she lived, and her sister being informed, an entrance was effected, and the unfortunately lady was found lying dead on her bedroom floor, having apparently fallen dead on getting out of bed. Mr. Toms was foreman of the Jury, and the following evidence was taken:-

Mrs. E. Jacolette, wife of Mr. M. Jacolette, photographic artist, Northbrook House, Biggin Street, Dover, said the body at 2, Avenue Terrace, was that of his sister, Mary Ann Harbour. She was 60 years of age, and a single woman. It was Miss Harbour’s house, and Mrs. Minter lived with her. Mrs. Minter had been away to Canterbury to spend Christmas with her friends, and Miss Harbour was left alone. Witness last saw her a month ago. She was very well then, but said that she was not equal to coming to Dover very often. She was not of very strong health. She could cook very well herself, but witness could not say if she would take much trouble to prepare food for herself. She had every means to get food, and she went without, it was her own fault. On Friday afternoon, about four o’clock, Mrs. Goldfinch, a neighbour, sent a message to witness that the house was closed and the blinds down. Witness came over by the six o’clock train, and found the house locked up and the blinds down. When they could not make anyone hear, witness thought it best to get a carpenter to have the window opened. One came, and he opened the window, and got through and opened the door. The carpenter and Mrs. Goldfinch went upstairs first. She followed, and saw the deceased in the back bedroom, on the floor, almost at the front of the bed. She had been to bed, and was in her night clothes. There was a teapot and some toast and biscuits. The teapot was empty, and the cup and saucer had not been used. She was lying on her left side. Witness had not the slightest reason to suppose that she took her own life. She was comfortably off.

Dr. A. Long said he was called in about 7.30 on the previous evening. He was taken into the bedroom described by the last witness, and found the deceased lying on the floor, she having been dead for some hours. She was lying on her left side, with both legs and arms bent up, but no expression of pain on her face. It was apparent that she had quietly got out of bed, and walked round the room and fell down. There were no external marks on the body. Witness thought she fell down through sheer disability. She was very thin, but she was of spare habit. Witness had attended her about ten years ago for influenza, and saw her also about a week ago, but not as a patient. When he attended her she was very weak, and the same thing might have happened then. He attributed death to weakness caused by the cold acting on her weak heart. There were no suspicious circumstances as far as he could see.

One of the Jurymen said that he saw the deceased on Thursday morning when he called for orders.

Mrs. Jacolette said that a Mrs. King had met the deceased out on Thursday, going to the Stores.

The Coroner, in summing up, pointed out that the cause and manner of death seemed to be clear. Probably, in the absence of Mrs. Minter, she hardly looked after herself as she should have done, and in her weak state was seized with an attack of syncope, and there being no one to render her assistance, died.

The Jury returned a verdict in accordance with the medical evidence.

From the Dover Express and East Kent News, Friday, 16 July, 1915. Price 1d.

UNLAWFUL USE OF WATER

At the Dover Police Court on Monday, before Mr. M. Pepper (in the chair), Captain R. B. Cay, R.N., and Messrs. H. Hobday.

Charles Hogg, of the “Railway Hotel,” River, pleaded guilty to a summons for, on the 24th June, then being a person supplied with water from the East Kent Water Company, unlawfully fixing a hose pipe to the supply without first obtaining the permission of the said company. A second charge was preferred against the defendant for using the water for other than domestic purposes.

Mr. Ernest Chitty, appeared to prosecute and it was a serious case at the present time when the company had to supply a large number of troops in the district. It was a serious matter that people should have unauthorised use of the water. It was well know that if water was required for garden purposes the water was supplied by meter. Defendant had a large garden and two lawns and not only did he get the ordinary warning which is got by printed notices on the demand notes, but last year a special notice was attached that the water should not be used for garden purposes. In addition to that on the 14th, or 15th, or 16th of June he was found having a hose attached to the supply and watering the garden and he was warned about the matter, the Company decided not to prosecute on that occasion. However, on the 24th, the same thing was found to be going on, and, although the Company did not want to be vindictive against this man they wished it to be a warning. If people wanted water for their garden they have it by paying a minimum of 7s. 6d. a quarter, and to pay by meter.

George Harmer Gilham, 12, The Avenue, Kearsney, local manager to the East Kent Water Company, said on or about the 16th June in the evening he saw a hose pipe connected through defendant’s window and water going on to the lawn. Witness warned him that it must not be done again unless he paid for it and had permission. On the 24th of June he saw the same hose pipe through the window and watering the lawn. He went to the house and saw the son, and the son’s wife, he thought it was. He thought he heard defendant in the house.

The Bench inflicted a fine of £1.

Defendant: The first summons I have ever had, and I am 67 years of age.

The second charge was withdrawn on the bench making a conviction of the first case.

The Chairman said the bench had taken the two charges into consideration.

From the Dover Express and East Kent News, Friday, 10 December, 1937. Price 1½d.

SHARE OUT DINNER

Mr. Weston, licensee of the "Railway Hotel," Kearsney, applied for an extension from 10 p.m. to 1 a.m., on December 8th , for a dinner and dance in connection with the annual share out.

The Chief Constable said there was no objection.

The Mayor: Won't be much left, will there?

The application was granted.

From the Dover Express and East Kent News. 31 March 1939.

The West Street Foxhounds will meet at 11.30 a.m. on Thursday, April 6th - Bell, Kearsney, (by invitation).

From the Dover Express and East Kent News. 4 July 1952.

NEW SITE FOR "SUICIDE SEAT"

The Chairman, Alderman A. J. Fenn, reported to the Works Committee on Tuesday that he and the Borough Engineer had agreed that the only suitable alternative site for the seat at the bottom of Whitfield Hill was by the Railway Hotel.

At its last meeting the Committee had agreed that the seat should be removed from the bottom of Whitfield Hill after one member had said it was almost suicidal to sit there.

From the Dover Express, Thursday, 24 February, 2011. 60p

BELLS AT THE BELL

Advertising feature

Wedding co-ordinator Kylie Marsh, owner of Gorgeous to Go, the gift and wrapping service, has recently launched Wedding Bells at The Railway Bell.

Situated in the popular village of River near Dover, Kylie intends to make the most of this traditional British pubs lovely location and combine it with her planning skills to offer a truly bespoke service.

"The setting really lends itself to country-style weddings, explains Kylie. "But I am more than happy to come up with a bespoke design or theme - whatever your wish is."

Kylie likes to really get to know her clients and is available for consultation 24/7. She is quick to point out what a wonderful wedding need not cost the earth. With a book full of contacts, she will always go the extra mile to ensure best possible deal on everything, from teaspoons to toilets!

Kylie will take the strain and stress out of all your wedding planning, leaving you free to enjoy the whole experience from beginning to end.

Wedding Bells at The Railway Bell will be hosting a Wedding Fayre on March 26. 2011, from 10am to 4pm. Held within the actual venue, there will be a range of specially selected exhibitors from the local area, all able to give you a taste of what they can provide. Admission is free and there is parking available.

For more information, contact Wedding Bells at The Railway Bell on 07789 937638.