From the Dover Express and East Kent Intelligencer,
16 February, 1872. Price 1d.
Charles Spanner was charged with stealing from the stables of Francis
Packham, in Trevanion Street, on the 20th inst, a black coat; and also
with stealing from the office adjoining the stables, a curb chain, and a
pair of leather breeches, the property of the same gentleman.
Thomas Andrews said: I am Inspector of Police at Canterbury. Fro
information I received I went to Chilham, and found the prisoner at the
"Alma" public-house. Mr. Packham was with me, and he pointed out the
prisoner to me. The curb-chain I produced was found on the prisoner, and
identified by Mr. Packham as his property. Mr. Packham had lost a coat
and a pair of breeches. I believe they have been sold by the prisoner.
Sergeant Stevens then asked for a remand in order that the stolen
property might be found.
The Magistrates remanded the case till the following Monday.
REMANDED CHARGE
Charles Spooner, a stableman who had been remanded from the previous
Thursday, was again brought up in the custody of police-detective
Hemmings, charged with stealing from the stables of Mr. Francis Packham,
in Trevanion Street, on the 27th inst., a black coat, value 24s., an
overcoat value 12s., the property of a groom in the employ of Mr.
Packham; and also with stealing from the office adjoining the stable
yard a curb-chain, a pair of hooks, and a pair of leather breeches, of
the value of 10s. 6d., the property of Francis Packham.
The charges having been read to the prisoner, he was further charged
with stealing from Mr. Packham's stable a comb and a pair of scissors.
Mr. Edwin Packham deposed: I carry on business at the Marine Livery
Yard, Trevanion Street. The prisoner came into my employ on the 8th Jan.
I employed him as a stableman. The pair of breeches, the curb-chain, and
the two hooks are my father's property. I believe the comb and the pair
of scissors produced belong to a groom, whose master's horse was put in
our stables. The coat produced belongs to one of the men working in our
yard. When I last saw the leather breeches, the curb chain, and the
hooks, they were lying in the office adjoining the stable-yard. I missed
them on Tuesday evening last. The prisoner received his wages on the
evening of Saturday week; and he has not attended since. In consequence
of something I heard, I went to Canterbury on Wednesday last. I gave
information to the police as to the loss of the property. Inspector
Andrews accompanied me to Chilham, where the prisoner was found, at the
"Alma" public-house. Inspector Andrews' charged him with stealing the
breeches, the curb-chain, and the hooks. The prisoner was taken to St.
Augustine's, and on searching him there the curb-chain and hooks were
found on him. The hooks are odd ones, and the property of my father. The
leather breeches are also his property. The value of them altogether is
10s. 6d.
Thomas Godsmark deposed: I am a horse dealer and reside at Sturry. In
consequence of something that had been told me, I went to the canteen at
the Canterbury barracks. I there saw the prisoner. I told him I had
heard that he was going to enlist, and had a pair of leather breeches to
sell. He said he had, and he showed them me saying that he wanted 4s.
for them. He was wearing them underneath a new pair of trousers. I
offered the prisoner half-a-crown for them; but I finally gave him 3s.
In consequence of something I heard after I had brought the breeches, I
went to the police-station at Canterbury, and I told the police that I
had brought the breeches off the prisoner. He told me before I brought
them of him that the breeches were his property. I had sold the breeches
to Mr. Wratham, of Broad Street, before I gave information to the
police.
Thomas Andrews, Inspector of police at Canterbury deposed: In
consequence of something Mr. Packham told me on Wednesday last, I
immediately proceeded to Chilham, where I found the prisoner, sitting in
the tap-room of a public-house, I told him he was charged with stealing
a number of articles from Mr. Packham's stables at Dover. He made no
reply. I took him to St. Augustine's, at Canterbury, and on his being
searched, the curb-chain and hooks produced were found on him. I
afterwards went to Mr. Wratham's in Broad Street, where the breeches
were handed over to me.
The Bench determined, before proceeding further, to deal with the
prisoner on the charge of stealing the leather breeches, the curb-chain,
and the hooks, the property of Mr. Packham, and committed him to take
his trial at the Spring Quarter Session on these charges.
The charge of stealing a black cloth coat, value 2s. and an overcoat
value 12s. the property of James Lewis, a groom in the employ of Mr.
Packham, on the 27th inst., was then read over to the prisoner, and the
following evidence was given in support of it:-
James Lewis deposed: I am in the employ of Mr. Packham, and I reside
in Townwall Street. The coat produced is my property. I last saw it on
the 27th inst., hanging up in the harness room at Mr. Packham's stable
yard. The prisoner came to me on that evening and wanted me to lend him
the coat he now has on. I lent it to him, telling him not to keep me
waiting long without it, as my other coat was wet. I did not lend him
the black cloth coat produced; I only lent him the overcoat he is
wearing now. I missed the black cloth coat on Sunday morning. The value
of it is 2s. I intended the prisoner to return me the overcoat the same
evening that I lent it him. He only borrowed it to go into the town. I
did not think he intended to keep it for a week. I saw the prisoner in
the town on the evening of the 27th ult. He was wearing my overcoat,
which he now has on, at the time. He then told me he was going home. I
did not see him after that evening until he was brought up here in
custody last week. The prisoner did not say anything to me about the
overcoat or the black cloth coat when I last saw him on the evening of
the 27th ult., neither did he tell me that he intended leaving Mr.
Packham's service. The value of the overcoat is 12s.
By the prisoner: I am certain I did not lend you the black cloth coat
produced.
Thomas Andrews deposed: When I took the prisoner into custody, on
Wednesday morning last, he was wearing the black coat produced, as well
as the overcoat he now has on. The cloth coat was worn underneath the
overcoat.
The prisoner, having been cautioned in the usual manner, said he did
not take either of the coats with the intention of stealing them.
Major Crookes told the prisoner he would be committed to take his
trial at the next Quarter Sessions on this charge also.
The charge of stealing the comb and the pair of scissors was not
pressed against the prisoner, the owner not being present.
|
From the
https://www.kentonline.co.uk By Joe Wright, 6 July 2021.
Old Alma in Chilham, outside Canterbury, to be converted into flats after
developers scrap demolition plans.
A historic former pub has been saved from demolition - but will still
be converted into flats.
Developers had hoped to knock down the 19th century Old Alma in Chilham,
near Canterbury, and build the new homes in its place.
But after ditching their original plans in the face of a public
backlash, they have now been given the go-ahead to transform the
building into flats.
Two more apartments will also be constructed on the site, with
outbuildings making way.
The former pub, which stands facing the A28 and is driven past by
thousands each day, was built in the mid-1800s.
It was turned into a B&B 25 years ago but business is now said to have
dried up.
Owner Anthony McNamara, who took over the reins of the site in 2019,
devised plans to flatten the Victorian inn and replace it with eight
flats.
Proposals were submitted to Ashford Borough Council but withdrawn
following objections from villagers wanting to protect the premises.
A revised scheme was then put forward at the end of last year after
developers conceded they could not demolish the pub - which was
originally built by the London, Chatham and Dover Railway company.
In submitting the second bid, planners said: "The existing Old Alma
building has no architectural merit but, during the consultation period
of the previous submission, it became apparent residents felt it had
significant historical interest and should be retained."
While the decision to ditch the demolition plans was welcomed by Chilham
parish council and other residents, objections were lodged against the
scheme for being "completely out of place in the area".
But the council's planning department has rubber-stamped the proposals.
They said: "The Alma is not a listed building but is of historic
interest in so far as its function on a historic routeway.
"The scheme would result in the demolition of some outbuildings and
development within an area of archaeological interest. "Subject to
conditions however, it is considered this would be acceptable and this
view is in line with that of Kent County Council Heritage."
The nearby A28 and A252 junction is an accident blackspot, yet in making
its decision on the project, the borough council said it will "not
result in a significant impact on the local highway network".
|