|
166 Snargate Street
167 Snargate Street
  
A licensed house prior to 1832 and Dover Harbour Board
were the proprietors when it was auctioned in May 1859. The lease of 61
years had commenced in April 1834. The (unknown) buyer paid £550. George
Eastman was still dispensing drinks there in 1870 but then the picture
fades. My notes suggest the premises later becoming the "Lord Roberts" but I
cannot reconcile any facts with the number.
|
From the Dover Telegraph and Cinque Ports General
Advertiser, Saturday 7 January, 1837.
ACCIDENTS FROM THE SNOW
On Monday evening Mrs. Brewer, of the "Bee Hive Tavern," Snargate
Street, while in the act of crossing from a neighbour's to her own
house, had the misfortune to slip down and break one of her legs. The
requisite assistance was promptly given, and she is doing well.
|
|
From the Dover Telegraph and Cinque Ports General
Advertiser, Saturday 9 November, 1839.
CORONER'S INQUEST
An inquest was held on Wednesday last, at the "Bee Hive," before G.
T. Thompson, Esq., Coroner for the borough of Dover, on the body of Mary
Goodwin, aged 18, who had destroyed herself by taking poison.
Thomas Coleman, surgeon, deposed, that he had opened the body, and
analyzed the contents of the stomach, which were highly impregnated with
arsenic, and which had, no doubt, caused the death of the deceased.
Eliza Leigh, milliner, Snargate Street examined. "The deceased was
servant in the house, and had lived with them about three weeks. On
Sunday, the deceased had permission to dine with her sister, and
returned home about nine o'clock in the evening. I saw her on Monday
morning, when she came into the work-room to receive instructions for
some errands, which she went out to execute, and returned home about
noon. She then appeared pale, and I asked her if she was ill; but she
said no. She then had a luncheon of bread, cheese, and beer, which she
partook of at the table where the rest of us had been eating. At five
o'clock we dined with the apprentices, and the deceased had some mutton
broth; but refused to take any meat. About half an hour afterwards I
heard someone cough as if they were sick, and I asked the deceased if
she had been sick; and she replied, yes; but that she was better. She
then went to Charlton on an errand, and returned in about half an
hour, and lit the fire which had gone out during her absence. I did not
see her again till about half-past nine o'clock, when I again heard some
one sick in the yard. I again asked her what was the matter, and she
said she had a head-ache, and pains in her limbs, when I desired her to
go to bed, and gave her some brandy which she drank. I did not see the
deceased again until ten o'clock the next morning when I heard her
calling; I went and asked what she required, and she said some gin and
ginger, as she had a pain in her stomach. I did not see the deceased
again alive. The deceased appeared to me obliging and cheerful; but I
had heard there was something mysterious in her manner, and I intended
to make some enquiry into it."
Deborah Hill examined. "I am apprentice to Miss Leigh. The deceased
slept in the same room as myself, on Monday night. She did not make any
noise to disturb me till about four o'clock, when she said she hoped it
was not time to get up. I rose about seven, and left her in bed. I have
never seen any powders or poison in her room. She never said anything to
me about taking poison or dying, but had said she was very uncomfortable
because her mother was so cross."
Sarah Leigh re-examined: "During the time deceased has been in our
service I have observed nothing particular in her manner, except
sometimes coming home crying, after she had been out, when she said her
mother did not use her well. I have searched the boxed of the deceased
and all places she usually had access to, but have discovered nothing
that would bear on this enquiry. She appeared to me, on Monday night and
Tuesday morning, composed, although distressed by sickness; and made no
complaint except of pain in her stomach. I said to her on Tuesday
morning, that if she did not bear up I must send for her mother, and she
replied "No, do not; if you send for anyone, send for my sister."
Esther Prescott, wife of Richard Prescott, mariner, examined: "I saw
the deceased, who is my sister, on Sunday last about noon. She remained
about an hour and a half. When she left she said she should call in the
evening if I would let her walk out with her sister, which I said I
would do, but she never came. Her manner was then cheerful as usual. I
had not seen her to speak to her till last Sunday for near two years,
there having been a coldness between us. My husband told me on Sunday
that she was coming. The deceased did not like her step-father; and in
consequence seldom went to see her mother."
Sarah Baker examined: "I live with Mrs. Marsh, in Last Lane, and knew
the deceased well, having been acquainted with her from childhood. On
Monday she came to me about eleven o'clock, with a piece of paper, on
which she wished me to write 'Twopennyworth of Arsenic' in Mrs. Hiller's
name, for her mistress did not like to have it in her own name. She
further said her mistress had given her a note for the poison; but she
had been up the shaft, and lost it. I would not write it, as I told her
I believed she wanted it to poison a young Artilleryman. I said this in
a laugh, when she went away, saying she could not stop long before she
would serve him out. I saw her on Sunday between twelve and one o'clock,
when she said she had been looking for an Artilleryman, named Peter
Preel; and that she would try and find him before she went home.
Deceased told me on Monday, she would get the poison where she used to
get it when she lived with Mrs. Hillier.
Peter Preel, gunner, Royal Artillery, examined: "I have known the
deceased about six weeks. I saw her on Monday evening in the street
about seven o'clock, but we did not speak. I saw her also on Sunday
morning while I was sentry on the bridge, at the Heights. She came up
the steps; and then waiting a short time at the foot of the bridge,
returned without speaking. She appeared as if she wished to speak to me.
The last time I spoke to her, was Wednesday; when I told her I did not
want to speak to her any more. She said 'If you won't speak to me, I'll
haunt you always.' She used to follow me constantly, which I did not
like. She never threatened before me, to destroy herself."
It now being near eleven o'clock, the Coroner observed that the
evidence adduced did not appear sufficient for the Jury to come to any
other than a general verdict; and the case being of some importance,
under his direction the inquest was adjourned till Thursday; when the
enquiry was again resumed, at eight o'clock.
John Thomas Harvey, Chemist, examined: "I recollect selling poison to
a young woman on Monday, but do not know her name. She asked for
twopenny-worth of arsenic for Mrs. Hiller. She had purchased arsenic of
me about four months ago, which, she said was for Mrs. Hiller, whose son
accompanied her. I served the poison in a white paper, with a printed
label, "Arsenic - Poison." She has at other times bought salts of
sorrel, which is a poison, and used in cleaning bonnets. There was
nothing particular in her manner when she purchased the arsenic on
Monday, which she said was to destroy rats."
The Coroner then summed up the evidence, and addressed the Jury, who
retired to consider their verdict. After a short time the foreman, Mr.
Hopley, returned, saying if it could be allowed, the Jury were anxious
to have the evidence of Mr. T. Houghton's servant, as they had
understood she could throw much light on this enquiry. The Coroner
replied that if wished, the Jury had the power of calling further
evidence, and issued a warrant for the attendance of-
Hannah Hoile, who being sworn said, "I knew the deceased, and saw her
on Monday last between three and four o'clock, and she then told me she
came to wish me good bye; on which I asked where she was going. She
replied, not out of town; and I said, then why do you wish me good bye?
She replied, you will soon find out, for news soon flies. I have found
out the young man I walk with, nicely; and I don't like the news I hear
about him. He walks with other young women; and I have never dreaded
life as I have done for the last two or three days. I asked the deceased
what she intended to do; and she replied, to poison myself. I thought
nothing of this, as she had several times in the summer told me she
should make off with herself. She appeared on Monday very low spirited,
but was not wild or excited. The artilleryman's name is Preel; and
deceased told me she was in the family way by him.
The Jury having again retired for a quarter of an hour, returned with
a Verdict, "That deceased destroyed herself by taking poison during a
temporary fit of insanity."
|
|
From the Dover Telegraph and Cinque Ports General
Advertiser, Saturday 17 October, 1840. Price 5d.
DOVER POLICE COURT
Michael Moir, 34, a private in the 77th regiment of foot, was charged
with stealing, on the 28th of August last, a basket, containing sundry
articles of grocery, from Daniel Pound, a coast guardsman. From the
evidence produced it appeared, that prosecutor, who is fond of "lifting
his elbow very oft," came down to Dover on the evening in question, for
some articles of grocery, and getting a leetle drop too much, in
his ramblings up and down Snargate-street, encountered the prisoner, who
being a brother lately from the Emerald Isle, shared in the
bounty of the mountain dew. Having "stuffed both their skins," till Mr.
Brewer, of the "Beehive" public house, perceived they were a little
touched. They were reminded by the worthy host of the lateness of
the hour, when they went away, and proceeded towards their destinations.
They had not gone far, however, before the prisoner snatched the basket
containing the grocery from Pound's hand, and made off with it. What
became of Pound during the remainder of the night was not ascertained;
certain it was he did not like the encounter the frowns of his amiable
partner, and did not go home, but early in the morning found his way to
the station-house, to give information of the robbery. On his way to the
station-house, he met an artillery man, whom he recollected to have
quarrelled with on the previous evening. The artillery-man, however,
denied the charge, and assisted in finding the prisoner. The
artillery-man said, that in the evening in question he believed that
prosecutor and he had one blow between them; but he could not say who
gave it. After committing the robbery, at appeared that the prisoner had
amused himself with drinking potations, "pottle deep," at the "Rising
Sun," public house, in company of a fair damsel of the name Dunn, to
whom he communicated the intelligence of his late good fortune. She,
however, gave information of the same to the police, and prisoner was
taken into custody. Prisoner said the young woman he passed the night
with gave him the articles that were found upon him, because she did not
know what to do with them. She said she found them.
Sentenced to three months hard labour.
|
|
From the Dover Telegraph and Cinque Ports General
Advertiser, Saturday 31 January, 1846.
NARROW ESCAPE OF LIFE FROM THE FALL OF A WALL AT
DOVER
One of the most miraculous preservations from impending danger and
death that it has ever fallen our lot to record occurred in Snargate
Street during the present week. We have been favoured from an authentic
source with the principal facts, and, without entering upon a lengthened
detail of all the particulars, are enabled to furnish the following:-
About midnight on Monday Mr. E. Bottle, grocer, of Snargate-street
was disturbed by a noise, apparently like he falling of bricks, in the
rear of his premises. Supposing that depredators were endeavouring to
effect an entrance, he aroused the male inmates of his establishment,
with whom he searched the yard &c., and for a while watched the back of
his premises; but observing no indications rendering further precaution
necessary, the whole then returned to rest, totally unconscious of their
critical and perilous position. About three o'clock (Tuesday morning) Mr.
Bottle was awakened by a loud crash, and on proceeding towards the
supposed spot a brick struck his hand, and knocked out the light which
he held. The fearful truth no flashed upon his mind - that the wall at
the back had fallen against the house - and alarming the inmates, whose
exit by the staircase was stopped by bricks, &c., he then called the
assistance of the police, who promptly repaired to the spot, and
procured ladders, by which all in the house, viz., Mr. and Mrs. Bottle,
two Miss Frys, (who were staying on a visit,) two young men, and a
maid-servant effected an escape in their night clothes from the front
window, and were received by Mr. Squire, whom the alarm had aroused, and
who in the kindest manner instantly supplied what the exigences of the
case rendered necessary. After some time had elapsed it was found, on an
examination of the premises, that the wall erected against a bank at the
base of the cliff, about 30 feet in height, and the same in length, as
well as some of the bank, had fallen, and partially destroyed a range of
storehouses, and the parlour, some of the furniture of which was driven
into the cellar, while portions of the fallen mass had forced their way
into the very apartment where the Miss Frys slept, and who, but for the
fortunate position of their bed, must have been crushed to death. At the
dawn of the day the removal of the rubbish was commenced, and upwards of
200 loads have been already removed. We hear that Mrs. Bottle, who has
recently purchased the premises, is a sufferer to the extent of about
£400, and that the re-building of the destroyed building &c., will
require an expenditure of 3 or £400 more.
The premises adjoining Mr. Bottle's also experienced the destructive
effects of the calamitous occurrence. At Mrs. Brewer's (the "Bee Hive")
large masses fell on a workshop and the kitchen, driving the materials
into the tap-room, over which Mrs. Brewer was sleeping; but the head of
the bed being placed against the wall, the progress of the large stones
was checked, and a most providential escape thus afforded was speedily
effected by the front door. Some loose rubbish fell, however, on the
head of Mr's Brewers bed, and slightly grazed her face, while two pigs
were actually forced into her bed-room. Mrs. Brewer, it will be
remembered, was left a widow a short time since; and as the workshop
contained several new models, &c., belonging to her son, to enable whom
to carry on business a as plasterer she has expended all her means, this
loss will indeed be most severely felt.
At Mr. Elgar's, fruiterer, a quantity of rubbish also fell through
the roof into an attic where two of his sons were sleeping. The whole
family were immediately aroused, and in a state of alarm rished into the
street with only their bed clothes on, and were taken in by Mr. Squire,
from whom they received the same humane treatment as was experienced by
Mr. and Mrs. Bottle &c.
|
|
From the Dover Express and East Kent Intelligencer,
19 July, 1867.
DESERTION
Charles Outley, a private of the 102nd Regiment was charged with
desertion.
The prisoner had been apprehended by police sergeant Stevens at
twenty minutes past six the same evening, in the Market Place. He had no
pass, and in answer to the police officer he said he had none with him,
but that he had been provided with one, and had left it with a girl
named Jenny, ay the "Bee Hive" public-house. The sergeant went to the
"Bee Hive," and found "Jenny," but she declared she had seen no pass. As
the regiment was quartered at Shorncliffe the officer took prisoner into
custody on a charge if desertion.
The prisoner denied that he was a deserter, but admitted that he was
absent without leave. He said he had left his quarters on the previous
evening.
The Magistrates ordered his conveyance back to Shorncliffe.
|
|
From the Dover Express and East Kent News, Friday,
15 May, 1868.
AN IMPUDENT SWINDLER.
George Smith, who described himself as servant to the Colonel of the
33rd Regiment, quartered at Shorncliff, was charged with stealing two
silk pocket-handkerchiefs, the property of Mr. George Bennett, general
outfitter, of Snargate Street, and also with obtaining by false
pretences from Mr. Bennett, two pounds' worth of silver and from Mr.
George Ambrose Eastman, landlord of the "Beehive Inn," Snargate Street,
one pound's worth.
The offences were taken in three separate charges, the first deposed
of being the false pretence practised upon Mr. Eastman.
George Ambrose Eastman said the prisoner came into his house on
Saturday afternoon. He had been there on the previous night, and
remained some time. He was served with refreshments on Saturday and
before leaving he asked witness if he could oblige him with change for a
couple of sovereigns. Witness found he had only one pound's worth of
silver in the till and he laid that on the top of the bar. The prisoner
took it up, and on witness asking for the sovereign, he said, "All
right, I have left a note with Mr. Bennett, who was unable to change
it." Witness then allowed him to take the silver, and walked to the shop
of Mr. Bennett with him. He remained in the shop some time, apparently
selecting goods, and as witness had run to and fro to his own place, he
ultimately lost sight of the prisoner and did not see him again till he
was in custody.
By the prisoner: I did not on the Friday evening get on very friendly
terms with you or offer to lend you any money you might require.
Mr. Bennett was then called to prove that the representation made by
the prisoner to Mr. Eastman as to leaving a bank note with him was
untrue.
On the charge of stealing a handkerchief being proceeded with, Mr.
Bennett said the prisoner came to his shop on Saturday evening about the
time he was said to have left Mr. Eastman, and selected a great quantity
of goods, amounting altogether in value to about £6. He represented that
he was captain of the ?????? a vessel lying in the harbour and that he
was on a voyage to India. He did not take the goods away; but he (Mr.
Bennett) was subsequently taken to the police-station, where he found
the prisoner, who had in his possession the silk handkerchief produced,
and one orange. They did not form part of the goods which the prisoner
had selected.
Police-constable Baker said that on Saturday evening in consequence
of information received, he went in search of the prisoner, and found
him at the "Military Arms"
public-house, Snargate Street. He told him that he wanted to see him on
a charge of felony, and took him to the police-station. On searching him
the purple handkerchief was found upon him, and the other was afterwards
taken from him.
In reference to obtaining the two pounds' worth of silver from Mr.
Bennett, it appeared that after he had selected the things above
referred to, he requested Mr. Bennett to make out the bill, and have it
ready by a certain time, when he would call and pay it and fetch the
things away. He then asked Mr. Bennett if he could oblige him with a
couple of pounds' worth of silver, as he was wanting some money to pay
the boat's crew. In consequence of the prisoner's representations Mr.
Bennett allowed him to have the money, and he then went away. Almost
immediately he had quitted the shop, however, Mr. Bennett's suspicions
were excited, and he made inquiries with the view of testing the
accuracy of the statements made by the prisoner, the result inducing him
to believe that they were fictitious.
Mrs. Caroline Foord, wife of John Foord, landlord of the "Gothic
Inn," Snargate Street, said that on Saturday evening the prisoner
entered the bar of the house and called for something to drink. While he
was standing there she had occasion to send her niece for an article of
grocery and laid down a sovereign, so that the niece might get change.
The prisoner thereupon said he had plenty of silver change if she wanted
any. She said that she would take what he had if he liked, and he then
counted down £3 worth of silver, and she gave him three sovereigns.
Baker was again called to prove that on the prisoner being searched a
purse was found upon him containing three sovereigns and some loose
silver.
The prisoner, who had nothing to say in reply to any of the charges,
was committed for trial at the next Quarter Sessions.
|
LICENSEE LIST
BREWER Samuel 1826-45? Dec'd
  
BREWER Ann 1846-47

TYLDEN John previous to 1852
ALLEN W T 1853 end
ALLEN Mrs Jane 1853-58

EASTMAN George Ambrose 1858-70

From the Pigot's Directory 1832-33-34
From the Pigot's Directory 1839
From the Pigot's Directory 1840
From Bagshaw Directory 1847
From Melville's Directory 1858
From the Post Office Directory 1862
|